Caffeine Blogs

New FDA Ban of Mini-Electroshock Device Shows Hypocrisy

Home Caffeine Blog Dangerous Side Effects of Antidepressant Zoloft No Child Left Unmedicated When Is a Diagnosis Not a Diagnosis Involuntary Psychiatric Commitment A Brutal Political Tool So What’s Wrong, Really, with Feeling Sadness or Anxiety? Telehealth Statistics Highlight Psychiatry’s Reliance on Opinion, NotFact, to Treat Their Patients Psychiatrists Cannot Adhere to Informed Consent Laws Psychiatry Turns Asylums into Inhumane Centers of Profit Fear Sells. So Does Irresponsibility Big Pharma Makes the Guns Can Anyone Trust “FDA Approval” for Antidepressants? Big Pharma: Follow the Money, Not the Morality You’re Worth More Sick or Crazy than Healthy Psychiatric Drugs and Going Postal Youth Suicides After Rx Free Books, DVDs, etc Order form Other Resources Latest News Penalties a Small Price to Pay for Big Pharma’s Fat Cats Suicides Occur as FDA Takes 2 Decades to Rule on Dangers of Singulair $267 Million Settlement against Acadia Psychiatric Hospitals Not Enough to Change Their Evil Ways NZ Government Apologizes for Fifty Years of Psychiatric Institution Abuse Innocent CT Woman Locked Up For False Diagnosis of Schizophrenia Reno Psychiatrist’s Remedy for Patient’s Suicide Attempt Antidepressant Clinical Trials by Pharma Companies Skew Efficiency Results Big Pharma Covert Marketing Win America’s Psychiatric Hospitals: Exploitation for Profit Gustavo Kinrys Sentenced for $19 Million Insurance Fraud Florida Finally Follows WHO and UN Call for Ban of ECT on Children A.D.H.D. Executives Accused of $100 Million Adderall Fraud Michigan Psych Patients Committed Involuntarily for Medicaid Profits Contact Us Home Caffeine Blog Dangerous Side Effects of Antidepressant Zoloft No Child Left Unmedicated When Is a Diagnosis Not a Diagnosis Involuntary Psychiatric Commitment A Brutal Political Tool So What’s Wrong, Really, with Feeling Sadness or Anxiety? Telehealth Statistics Highlight Psychiatry’s Reliance on Opinion, NotFact, to Treat Their Patients Psychiatrists Cannot Adhere to Informed Consent Laws Psychiatry Turns Asylums into Inhumane Centers of Profit Fear Sells. So Does Irresponsibility Big Pharma Makes the Guns Can Anyone Trust “FDA Approval” for Antidepressants? Big Pharma: Follow the Money, Not the Morality You’re Worth More Sick or Crazy than Healthy Psychiatric Drugs and Going Postal Youth Suicides After Rx Free Books, DVDs, etc Order form Other Resources Latest News Penalties a Small Price to Pay for Big Pharma’s Fat Cats Suicides Occur as FDA Takes 2 Decades to Rule on Dangers of Singulair $267 Million Settlement against Acadia Psychiatric Hospitals Not Enough to Change Their Evil Ways NZ Government Apologizes for Fifty Years of Psychiatric Institution Abuse Innocent CT Woman Locked Up For False Diagnosis of Schizophrenia Reno Psychiatrist’s Remedy for Patient’s Suicide Attempt Antidepressant Clinical Trials by Pharma Companies Skew Efficiency Results Big Pharma Covert Marketing Win America’s Psychiatric Hospitals: Exploitation for Profit Gustavo Kinrys Sentenced for $19 Million Insurance Fraud Florida Finally Follows WHO and UN Call for Ban of ECT on Children A.D.H.D. Executives Accused of $100 Million Adderall Fraud Michigan Psych Patients Committed Involuntarily for Medicaid Profits Contact Us New FDA Ban of Mini-Electroshock Device Shows the Hypocrisy of This Psychiatry-Controlled Agency By Robert Carter/February 13, 2025 A Graduated Electronic Decelerator (GED) delivers electric shocks as punishment to a person in order to control his or her behavior. The device was created by Matthew Israel, the founder of the Judge Rotenberg Center, as part of his behavior modification “utopia” school for children in Canton, MA. After an investigation into the device by  independent human rights experts working for the United Nations, the U.N. human rights agency condemned the use of Israel’s GED as “torture.” In 2011 the FDA ordered the Judge Rotenberg Center to stop using the GEDs because they were not FDA approved. Matthew Israel ignored that order and continued using the devices on his residents until the FDA finally and officially banned their use for behavior modification in 2020. The center was the only institution in the country using the GED for its harsh aversion therapy protocol. The Rotenberg Center has been a controversial institution for its ongoing behavior modification programs that include punishments of food deprivation, long term restraints, and sensory deprivation to control its young residents’ behavior, as well as the GED electroshocks. The GED was used on residents as young as seven or eight years old and reports have surfaced of children receiving as many as seventy-seven shocks at a time. GED  devices were worn in the daytime, during sleep, and even during showers, and shocks were administered at any of those times to the resident youth there, diagnosed with severe emotional and behavioral disorders or developmental disabilities. A 2006 report by the New York State Education Department found that the shock device was regularly used for minor infractions such as failing to be neat, rapping one’s foot around the leg of a chair, stopping work for more than ten seconds, using the  bathroom without permission, urinating on oneself after being refused the right to use the  bathroom, and screaming while being shocked. Six residents have died at the center for other reasons since it was founded in 1971. Human rights advocates and autism and disability support organizations have tried unsuccessfully to shut down the center for decades. A year after the FDA banned its GED use, a federal appeals court overturned the ban, saying that the FDA had to ban the device altogether or not all, referencing the 2020 FDA ban’s limit to aversion behavior modification therapy alone. In 2022 the United States Congress then amended the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to expand the FDA’s authority to ban such devices. The FDA has stated that “the risks presented by electric shock devices are both psychological (including suffering) and physical (including pain), each having a complex relationship with the electrical parameters of the shock. The FDA is now preparing its case to again ban them, but still only for their use in controlling self-injurious or aggressive behavior. The FDA is not proposing to ban electric shock devices currently used for other “therapeutic” purposes, such as smoking cessation, obesity,  alcoholism, gambling, anger issues, and other unwanted lifestyle behaviors. The question then becomes, if there are “risks presented by electric shock devices” which are